|
|
||||
|
結論: 這套Blinder是我們SML (速度量測實驗室)測試至今最有效的雷射槍的對策方式, SML本身不鼓勵也不推廣這類的雷射產品, 但是對於這Blinder的技術上的優勢表示驚訝,這套產品使得雷射槍變的無用武之地了! |
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Date: 7 March 2000 |
|||
|
|
Product- BLINDER is a product of Denmark designed to prohibit 904 nanometer laser guns from obtaining a speed-reading of target vehicle. It consists of two transmitters and an in-cabin enunciator giving the driver notification of laser's use. The transmitters are mounted in the grill of vehicle with attention given to a level, horizontal placement. The BLINDER is powered by 12 VDC of the vehicle. It must be noted that Europe has the highest use of laser in the world per capita.
|
|||
|
|
Evaluation Mythology- The use of laser guns is different than radar guns. Radar guns use a microwave emission and determine speed by a Doppler shift in the frequency emitted by the radar gun and that return from a reflective target. Laser determines speed by the "flight time" of 904 nanometer pulses of laser gun to determine distance and time to target and the returned pulse. The laser gun's computer remembers each pulse emitted and waits until the pulse is return from a reflective target. Six laser guns, all with different pulse rates, were used in the field evaluation including, Kustom Pro Laser II, Kustom Pro Laser III, Stalker LZ-1, LT1 Ultralyte LR, Riegl and Laveg. (Riegl and Laveg are European guns) The BLINDER test vehicle war targeted at a 1000-foot cone to determine if the laser guns could get a distance/speed reading prior to the installation of BLINDER counter measure. Once satisfied all laser guns were able to determine distance7speed without the BLINDER installed with the laser guns aimed at the front license plate and the driver's headlight, the BLINDER was installed. Laser guns were operated by Steve Hocker and Jams Travis, both police officers and instructors in lasers use in the United states The test vehicle was mid-sized car, Dodge neon, white in color. Test conditions were dry with a relative humidity of 05 and temperature of 55° F. Laser guns were operated in accordance with procedures outlined by the International Association of Chiefs of Police and standard police operation instructions. The test vehicle with BLINDER installed was targeted a 1,000 feet, which is the normal targeting, distance of police laser guns, first aimed at the front license plate and then at the driver's headlight. The vehicle was driven toward the laser guns at 30 mph and 60 mph with the driver counting down "3,2,1" at the distance cone of 1,000 feet. When the test vehicle reached the 1,000 foot cone, the laser was fired. The test vehicle and laser source were in radio communication. Two runs with each laser gun were made. The test was then replicated with the aiming point changed to 600 feet and continuing changing aiming points of license plate to highlight. Aiming at the highlight is necessary, as seventeen states have only one rear plate. Laser's beam width diverges little. At 500 feet it is only 18 inches wide compares to radar's 109 feet. Choosing the aiming point of the headlight at 600 feet is important. Many other laser countermeasure device's attempts to jam laser at this distance have failed due the narrow nature of laser beam at such a close range. While these other devices have only one transmitter attached to license plate bracket, they have great difficult affecting laser's target ability when aimed at the headlight. In many years cases they don't even see the laser beam as the distance from the headlight to license plate mounting bracket is greater than 18 inches. BLINDER offers two transponders equally placed in the vehicle's grill providing complete frontal coverage. |
|||
|
Field evaluation Report - page 2 |
||
|
|
Results- Representation of Blinder's performance graphically would be senseless. It successfully every laser gun, every time, in every targeting circumstance, from every distance. The BLINDER completely jammed laser guns from the point of targeting continually to the laser gun's location. Many laser guns have jamming codes reported to the operator. Depending on the laser gun, codes of E-6, E-7, and E-4 appear. However, these codes come from other circumstances other than encounter a jamming signal. There are no federal regulation making jamming laser guns a crime as laser in controlled by the United States Food and Drug Administration under CFR 21, subparts 1040 and 1041. However, jamming or attempting to jam a police radar gun is a federal felony and is controlled by the United States, Federal Communications Commission. Several states have passes laws against the use of any of jamming devise whether it is laser or radar based. These states include California, Utah, Minnesota, and Oklahoma. In other jurisdictions, enforcement personnel may ticket a laser or radar jammer user for "interfering with officer's discharge of his/her duties" or "obstruction of justice" Canadian authorities routinely confiscate jamming devices as ten of the twelve Canadian provinces have laws against the use of radar detectors or jamming devices. It must be noted that laser guns are not panned following a single target vehicle. Their normal use finds them targeted at one targeting point on the road. The operator then wait for individual vehicle to drive to the aiming point and the laser gun is fired. In the field test conducted this procedure was not followed, putting the BLINDER through the most rigorous circumstance of panning the gun as the BLINDER approached the laser gun sourer. Further, vehicular color is important in laser targeting and successfully gaining a speed-reading. Laser is light. White is the best reflective color as it reflects all colors while black absorbs all colors. A black Firebird with no front license plate is almost impossible to target with a police laser gun. There are no reflective surfaces and the car's black color absorbs laser emissions. A white car is best color for laser guns. All of SML's field tests use white vehicles as the color represents he " worst case" situation for countermeasures trying to cloak not only the laser's reflected signal but also to defeat white car's reflective characteristics. Conclusions- The BLINDER is the most effective laser countermeasure ever evaluated by Speed Measurement Laboratories, Ins (SML) SML does not condone nor promote the use o any countermeasure, but admires the technological superiority of the BLINDER in rendering useless speed laser sped gun enforcement. All field testing activities and evaluation summaries of
Speed Measurement Laboratories, Inc., (SML) remain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
On location technical assistance provided by SML staff including Dave Adams, E.E., Steve Hocker, James Travis, John White, Craig Pittman, Rod Sidney, Dana White, David Summers. |
||
|
conclusions- The BLINDER is the most effective laser countermeasure ever evaluated by Speed Measurement Laboratories, Ins (SML) SML does not condone nor promote the use o any countermeasure, but admires the technological superiority of the BLINDER in rendering useless speed laser sped gun enforcement.
|
||
|
結論: 這套Blinder是我們SML (速度量測實驗室)測試至今最有效的雷射槍的對策方式, SML本身不鼓勵也不推廣這類的雷射產品, 但是對於這Blinder的技術上的優勢表示驚訝,這套產品使得雷射槍變的無用武之地了! |
||
|
|
|
※ Speedyou.com
網域下所有圖文內容之產品專利權&圖文著作權屬於速必用科技有限公司所有,同業侵權行為
必依法追究 ※ |